|
SKYAID
New
Mission
Overview
Details
Medical
Watch
Heart attack
Stroke
World health
Emergency
Cost effective
Media
- Site Map
SKYCAR
Details
Overview
VTOL
Airline
Military
Transportation
Images
- Site
Map
Search
Translate
8
languages
| |
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
2000 Sep;44(8):972-9
Helicopter emergency medical
service in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest--a 10-year population-based study.
Skogvoll E, Bjelland E, Thorarinsson B
Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of
Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim. eirik.skogvoll@medisin.ntnu.no
BACKGROUND: In 1988, Norway established a countrywide, physician staffed
helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS). The medical benefit remains
controversial. The aim of this study was to estimate the population incidence
of HEMS involvement in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, report the patient
outcome and evaluate the contribution of HEMS to survival. METHODS: We studied
HEMS operations in central Norway (population 364,000) during a 10-year period
(1988-1997). Missions were classified according to type and quality of
intervention done by the primary care providers. HEMS witnessed cardiac
arrests were not considered. Patient outcome was determined as survival to
hospital discharge with cerebral performance category (CPC) score. The
contribution made by HEMS in each survivor was assessed from the timing of
return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and from subsequent need for advanced
medical intervention. The relation between survival and HEMS response time was
investigated by ordinal correlation. RESULTS: A total of 541 requests (14.9
per 100,000 inhabitants per year) were identified, of which 424 missions were
completed. Overall survival to discharge was 36/541 (6.6%), yielding a
population survival incidence of 1 per 100,000 per year. Ninety-five percent
of survivors made a favourable cerebral outcome (CPC 1 or 2). General
practitioners/ambulance personnel resuscitated 29 out of 36 survivors. The
remainder achieved ROSC after HEMS arrival. Case by case, HEMS assistance was
considered possibly important in 17 survivors. We found no relation between
survival and HEMS response time (P=0.77). DISCUSSION: Survival following
out-of-hospital cardiac arrest assisted by HEMS in this region is low, but not
negligible. While primary care is most important, HEMS may possibly
contribute to the additional survival of 0.19 to 0.46 patients per 100,000 per
year. This benefit appears to be independent of HEMS response time.
Skyaid observation: Slow Helicopter
service does not help with sudden cardiac arrest.
|